Showing posts with label Leader. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leader. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

A520.7.3.RB_RuggerioSteven

Coaching and Mentoring Toward Success

In a rapid changing environment, it is easy for people to get lost. Miss a meeting and suddenly you’re left out of the loop feeling like you got off a bus at the wrong stop.  Trying to be successful and “making it big” alone is as dated as our early captains of industry.  Today, companies are capitalizing on leadership by way of coaching and mentoring.  Once considered a fad, coaching and mentoring have increased the spotlight on sharing knowledge, experience, and ways to achieve personal and professional goals.
In the 1500s, the word coach described a horse-drawn vehicle that would get people from where they were to where they wanted to be.  Many years later, big buses with rows of seats also were called coaches, and their purpose was the same: to get people to where they wanted to go.  In Christian Coaching, Dr. Gary Collins (2002) said, “Coaching is the art and practice of enabling individuals and groups to move from where they are to where they want to be. Coaching helps people expand their visions, build their confidence, unlock their potential, increase their skills, and take practical steps toward their goal” (p. 14).
The Air Force has a rich tradition of leading and developing young men and women.  Though they have not fully implemented a “coaching” culture by way of an Air Force regulation, they have created a mentoring policy for their enlisted force.  From imparting pride and patriotism to ensuring adherence to customs and courtesies, Air Force non-commissioned officers (NCOs) are known as “the backbone” of the Air Force.  These men and women are trained and qualified to lead, develop, and mentor new, junior, or career NCOs.  The Air Force defines a mentor as “a trusted counselor or guide.”  Mentoring is a relationship in which a person with greater experience and wisdom guides another person to develop both personally and professionally.
Similar to the Air Force, Ted Engstrom defines a mentor as someone who “provides modeling, close supervision on special projects, and individualized help” that includes encouragement, correction, confrontation, and accountability.  According to Engstrom, a mentor is an authority in his or her field as a result of disciplined study and experience.  This person is willing to commit time and emotional energy to a relationship that guides an understudy’s growth and development.”  Over the years, mentoring has broadened to look more and more like coaching. A major difference, however, is that the mentor works as an expert, while the coach assumes that the client is the one best able and most likely to find direction and move forward” (Collins, 2002).  One of my favorite definitions of mentoring comes from Leslie Camino-Markowitz, director of Next Generation Leadership Programs who defined mentoring as, “Help by one person to another in making significant transitions in knowledge, work, thinking, or career” (p. 34).  This definition transitions nicely to how the Air Force operates.
Everyone in the Air Force has a supervisor. Every individual works for someone from the lowest airmen to the Secretary of the Air Force. However, just because you have a supervisor does not mean you have a mentor or a coach.  One of my first experiences with a mentor was when I was a Technical Sergeant with seven years of service.  Our unit’s Chief Master Sergeant brought me into his office and sat me down to talk.  Usually, these settings were more common for disciplinary action rather than career encouragement.  As I sat across from the “Chief” he began to tell me how he recognized great potential in my abilities and my leadership.  He wasn’t selling the Air Force but rather, building me.  After an hour of imparting wisdom and insight, the Chief pulled out a set of shoulder boards (insignia for a uniform).  He handed them to me and said, “Someday, I believe, you will wear these. I want to be the first to give them to you.”  I never forgot that moment.  It inspired me and made me want to make his vision come true.
While I did progress much quicker through the ranks than my peers, there were a few years where I “lost my way” and found myself making poor decisions from selfish motives.  When I finally came around and galvanized my focus to self-improvement, the Chief’s words continued to echo in my heart.  I retired at twenty-years as a Senior Master Sergeant (one grade below a Chief).  I could have reenlisted and continued my pursuit for another eight years but I chose to hang-up my uniform to better support and serve my family’s needs. While I don’t regret retiring, there are some regrets that I didn’t heed the Chief’s words more closely later in my career.  However, his mentoring in that moment will stay with me forever.
What I needed after the mentoring moment was a strong coach; someone willing to speak honestly about my decisions and strong enough to shake me from my selfishness. Alan Nelson, coach and editor of Rev! Magazine said, “A leadership coach is someone who walks with you for a season, steps into your life and provides feedback, a different perspective, and when appropriate, a nudge to move forward.”  The “nudge” Nelson refers to can be a frank discussion that paints a picture of reality to a person caught in a dazed sense of rationalization and ego.  Whetten & Cameron (2011) said, “In coaching, managers pass along advice and information, or they set standards to help others improve their work skills.  Skillful coaching is especially important when (1) rewarding positive performance and (2) correcting problem behaviors or attitudes” (p. 244).  The latter could have helped me make the changes necessary to achieve my Chief’s vision for my career. 
One of the key lessons I learned was the desire to achieve greatness must originate in the heart of the individual.  The coach and mentor merely motivate, inspire, and shed light on a pathway to achieve one’s passion and goals.  Once the light is light though, there is no great experience to help another achieve their dreams. Frederic Hudson, author of Handbook of Coaching said, “A coach is someone trained and devoted to guiding others into increased competence, commitment, and confidence.”  Watching a person develop into a strong leader fully alive is as satisfying as one’s own success. 
I’ve learned from my mistakes and my successes.  Randy Emelo (2011) said, “Everyone has something to teach and everyone has something to learn.” I’ve had both positive and negative supervisors.  And I’ve had mentors that encouraged me and imparted their wisdom.  Best of all, I still have coaches that walk with me and help me become everything I’ve ever hoped to be.  And while life can get overwhelming and the journey can be difficult, it is the three-fold combination of my faith, my wife’s love, and my coaches encouragement that combine to lift me to heights I never would have achieved in isolation.
Novak, Reilly, & Williams (2010) said, “The leader is not the problem solver or the primary idea-generator. The leader is the keeper of the vision and the one who helps build the capacity in others to successfully solve their own problems and generate multiple ideas and solutions” (p. 34).  From follower to leader and mentor to coach, the underlying motivation is the same: make better people and make people better.  Leadership is a people business.  You can’t lead money, power, or success.  Long after I am gone, the only thing that remains are the investments I made in other people.  That’s how true legacies are made. That’s a life well lived.  While I never put the Chief shoulder boards on my uniform, the trust and belief that one man had in my abilities still rings true today when life gets difficult.  Coaches and mentors understand the power of their words.

Steve

References:

Collins, G.R. (2002). Christian coaching. Colorado Springs, CO: NAVPRESS.
Emelo, R. (2011). Conversations With Mentoring Leaders, 65(6), 32.
Novak, D., Reilly, M., & Williams, D. (2010). Leadership Practices Accelerated into High Speed, 31(3), 32.
Whetton, D.A., & Cameron, K.S. (2011). Developing management skills. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.


Friday, May 24, 2013

A521.9.4.RB_RuggerioSteven

                                                   A New Type of Leader

My home library is full of leadership books.  Maxwell, Collins, Godin, Yukl, and Wooden to name a few.  At the end of this week another author will be added: Stephen Denning.  Reading his (2011) book The Leader’s Guide to Storytelling in my recent graduate class was a privilege.  I just finished the last chapter aptly titled, A Different Kind of Leader and it ranks as one of the best chapters I’ve ever read pertaining to character, integrity, courage…leadership.  It would serve me well to read it once a month.

At the beginning of the chapter Denning identified six specific dimensions of his “new leader.”
First, the interactive leader works with the world rather than against it.  This can be difficult for the type-A leader who wants to control and direct with incentives and mandates.  However, when leaders look at the situation from all perspectives, they can gain a greater clarity to the possibilities often overlooked.  Denning (2011) said, “Independent of hierarchical position and power can be exercised from wherever you are in the organization” (p. 270).

I ran into a similar situation as a lay leader at my last church. While I was not on staff and held no formal title, my leadership was apparent.  Every Saturday morning I held a men’s group open to men at our church and other churches in the area.  It started with eight men but grew to 50.  Rather than offer support, the pastoral staff felt threatened because a large group of men were meeting with someone who was not being paid (and therefore, could not be controlled).  This eventually led to the group’s demise since the group met at the church.  Looking back, if the leadership at the church had realized “leadership is not in title only,” they could have provided needed resources and benefited from the growth of all the men.

Secondly, interactive leadership both adds and subtracts elements from the leadership palette.  In leadership, there is no “one size fits all” method.  As a result, interactive leaders supplement the traditional management functions of command and control with delegation and authenticity. Interactive leadership also subtracts; removing manipulative and intimidation behaviors. Leadership cannot be practices in a vacuum.  It is the “whole-person” concept.  As Denning (2011) stated, “It’s not possible for leaders to exercise manipulative and spinning behavior in one part of their conduct and expects to be accepted as open, truthful, and trustworthy on other domains” (p. 270)

The third dimension of an interactive leader is interactive leadership builds on personal integrity and authenticity.  This is my favorite dimension.  All leadership rests in this characteristic.  Denning (2011) said, “Because you can communicate who you are and what you stand for, others come to know you and respect you for that.  Because you speak the truth, you are believed.  And, because you make your values explicit and act in accordance with those values, your values become contagious and others start to share them” (p. 270).

As a minister and marriage counselor, my life is always on display.  How can I tell men to unconditionally love their wives if I am not?  How can I speak of the value of integrity and honesty if I am lying and manipulative?  In short, I can’t. No one can – at least not for very long. For example, last year my wife and I spent time with my family in New York.  During our visit, we knew they watched how my wife and I related to one another.  By the end of our three-day visit, my parents and my brother and his wife were treating each other better.  They were holding hands, helping each other, and speaking like they had recently fallen in love.  On the way home, my wife and I discussed the power of authentic love and leadership. Our demonstrative care and respect for one another was contagious. 

The fourth dimension of the new leader is interactive leadership doesn’t depend on the possession of hierarchical authority.  As stated earlier, “anyone and everyone who can help clarify the direction or improve the structure, or secure support for it, or offer coaching that improves performance is providing leadership” (Denning, 2011). 

Fifth, interactive leadership benefits from an understanding of the different narrative patterns that can be used to get things done in the world.  The ability to use narrative depends on emotional intelligence.  Daniel Goleman’s book, Emotional Intelligence should be mandatory reading for leaders and managers.  Too often, people in authority look “outwardly” and never take the time to examine the motives and thoughts of their own thinking.  The strength of the interactive leader lies in their knowledge and application of emotional intelligence.

Lastly, interactive leadership entails active participation in the world rather than detached observation. Leaders cannot be completely detached from their followers.  The “ivory tower,” us versus them mindset dividing managers from workers must be eliminated.  In the military, many people follow orders merely because of rank.  In fact, many senior non-commissioned officers (NCO) used to tell younger airmen to do something and then tell them it was based on Air Force regulation 6-2.  When the airman would ask, “What is reg 6-2?” the NCO would respond, “I have six striped and you have two. Do it.”

I often thought, if I have to tell you to do something and demand it based on my rank or a regulation, then either you are acting utterly rebellious and disrespectful or I haven’t led correctly.  By integrating into the lives and decisions of employees, leaders can connect on an authentic level.  When I’ve taken action to minimize the gap between myself and my followers, we completed the task successfully AND developed strong levels of trust and cooperation.  Denning (2011) is absolutely correct when he said, “In most leadership situations, trust, respect, and collaboration are simply more effective than preemptive domination” (p. 271).

Legacy leads.

Steve

References:

Denning, S. (2011). The Leader’s Guide to Storytelling. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. New York, NY: Random House.